4.4 Article

Supplementation with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids augments brachial artery dilation and blood flow during forearm contraction

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 97, 期 3, 页码 347-354

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-006-0190-0

关键词

docosahexaenoic acid; eicosapentaenoic acid; brachial artery blood flow; brachial artery conductance; brachial artery dilation; exercise

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30-DK35747] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P30DK035747] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids such as docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) have beneficial effects on the heart and vasculature. We tested the hypothesis that 6 weeks of dietary supplementation with DHA (2.0 g/day) and EPA (3.0 g/day) enhances exercise-induced increases in brachial artery diameter and blood flow during rhythmic exercise. In seven healthy subjects, blood pressure, heart rate and brachial artery diameter, blood flow, and conductance were assessed before and during the last 30 s of 90 s of rhythmic handgrip exercise (30% of maximal handgrip tension). Blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and brachial artery vascular conductance were also determined. This paradigm was also performed in six other healthy subjects who received 6 weeks of placebo (safflower oil). Placebo treatment had no effect on any variable. DHA and EPA supplementation enhanced contraction-induced increases in brachial artery diameter (0.28 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.14 +/- 0.03 mm), blood flow (367 +/- 65 vs. 293 +/- 55 ml min-1) and conductance (3.86 +/- 0.71 vs. 2.89 +/- 0.61 ml min-1 mmHg-1) (P < 0.05). MAP and HR were unchanged. Results indicate that treatment with DHA and EPA enhances brachial artery blood flow and conductance during exercise. These findings may have implications for individuals with cardiovascular disease and exercise intolerance (e.g., heart failure).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据