3.9 Article

Recombinant multiepitope protein for early detection of dengue infections

期刊

CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 59-67

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/CVI.13.1.59-67.2006

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dengue fever is a mosquito-borne viral disease prevalent mainly in tropical countries. As the clinical manifestations of dengue are not very unique, laboratory diagnosis is crucial in identifying cases of dengue infection. Detection of dengue infection based on the identification of antidengue antibodies has emerged as a practical and reliable means of diagnosing dengue fever. We recently developed a customized recombinant dengue multiepitope protein (r-DME-G) that can specifically detect the immunoglobulin G (IgG) class of antidengue antibodies in patient sera. Using this strategy, we have now created another dengue multiepitope protein, r-DME-M, with specificity for the IgM class of antidengue antibodies. A synthetic gene encoding the r-DME-M protein was expressed as a maltose-binding protein fusion in Escherichia coli. The recombinant protein was purified in a single affinity chromatographic step to obtain yields of similar to 15 mg purified protein/liter of culture. The purified protein was used to develop an in-house IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and tested using a panel of 172 patient sera characterized using the commercially available Dengue Duo rapid strip test from PanBio, Australia. The IgM ELISA results showed that the r-DME-M protein not only recognized all IgM(+) samples identified by the PanBio test but also identified samples missed by the latter test. We also successfully adapted the r-DME-M protein to a rapid strip test format. This approach of creating customized antigens coupled to overexpression in E. coli and simple purification offers a promising alternative option to dengue diagnosis with the potential to circumvent the drawbacks of the whole virus antigen-based commercial kits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据