3.9 Article

Comparison of chromatin assays for DNA fragmentation evaluation in human sperm

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 53-59

出版社

AMER SOC ANDROLOGY, INC
DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.05068

关键词

SCSA; TUNEL; SCD; AOT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sperm chromatin integrity is vital for successful pregnancy and transmission of genetic material to the offspring. We evaluated chromatin integrity in sperm from 60 infertile men and 7 fertile donors comparing the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), TdT-mediated-dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL), the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test, and acridine orange staining technique (AOT). The TUNEL and SCD assays showed a strong relationship with the SCSA (r >.866; P <.001) for sperm DNA fragmentation, both in infertile men and donors of known fertility. ACT did not show any relationship with SCSA. The breakdown of the DNA fragmentation index (DFI) into 3 categories (:<= 15%, > 15%-< 30%, and >= 30%) showed that the SCSA, TUNEL, and SCD test predict the same levels of DNA fragmentation. ACT consistently showed higher levels of DNA fragmentation for each DFI category. DNA fragmentation in sperm between infertile men and donor sperm was significantly different (P <.05) under SCSA (22.0 +/- 1.6 vs 11.8 +/- 1-4), TUNEL (19.5 +/- 1.3 vs 11.1 +/- 0.9) and SCD (20.4 +/- 1.3 vs 10.8 +/- 1.1), respectively. DNA fragmentation in sperm evaluated by ACT did not differ (P >.05) between infertile men (31.3 +/- 2.4) and donors (32.7 +/- 4.8). ACT showed extreme variations for sperm DNA fragmentation in semen from both infertile men and donors. The problems of indistinct colors, rapid fading, and the heterogeneous staining were also faced. In conclusion, SCSA, TUNEL, and SCD show similar predictive values for DNA fragmentation, and AOT shows variable and increased levels of DNA fragmentation, which makes it of questionable value in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据