4.5 Article

Presence of apoptotic and nonapoptotic disseminated tumor cells reflects the response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/bcr1611

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Neoadjuvant systemic therapy ( NST) is an established strategy to reduce tumor size in breast cancer patients prior to breast- conserving therapy. The effect of NST on tumor cell dissemination in these patients is not known. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of disseminated tumor cells ( DTC), including apoptotic DTC, in breast cancer patients after NST, and to investigate the correlation of DTC status with therapy response. Methods Bone marrow aspiration was performed in 157 patients after NST. DTC were detected by immunocytochemistry using the A45 - B/ B3 anticytokeratin antibody. To detect apoptotic DTC the antibody M30 ( Roche Diagnostics, Germany) was used, which detects a neo- epitope expressed only after caspase cleavage of cytokeratin 18 during early apoptosis. Results The incidence of DTC in breast cancer patients was 53% after completion of NST. Tumor dissemination was observed more frequently in patients with no change/ progressive disease ( 69%) than in patients with partial remission or complete remission of the primary tumor ( 46%) ( P < 0.05). Ten out of 24 patients with complete remission, however, were still bone marrow positive. Apoptotic DTC were present in 36 of 157 ( 23%) breast cancer patients. Apoptotic cells only were detected in 14% of the patients with partial remission or complete remission, but were detected in just 5% of the patients with stable disease. Apoptotic DTC were detectable in none of the patients with tumor progression. Conclusion The pathological therapy response in breast cancer patients is reflected by the presence of apoptotic DTC. Patients with complete remission, however, may still have nonapoptotic DTC. These patients may also benefit from secondary adjuvant therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据