4.3 Article

Overcoming the stressful effect of low pH on soybean root hair curling using lipochitooligosacharides

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS
卷 37, 期 7-8, 页码 1103-1110

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00103620600586391

关键词

low pH; soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr]; root hair curling; lipochitooligosacharides

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Signal molecules are among the major factors required for the legume bacteria symbiosis. The excretion of signal molecules by plants stimulates the bacterial Nod genes resulting in the production of lipochitooligosacharides (LCOs). LCOs cause root hair deformation (RHD) and induction of nodule cells division, leading to the formation of nodules. The chemical structure of LCOs determines their biochemical activities; for example, removal of the sulfate group can significantly reduce the morphogenic activities of LCOs. Stressful conditions interrupt the excretion of signal molecules by the legumes' roots and consequently the inhibition of LCO production by the bacteria. This research has studied the effect of different concentrations of LCOs on RHD of two soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] cultivars, AC Bravour and Maple Glen, under acidity stress. In the first experiment, two different concentrations of LCO (10(-7) and 10(-6) M) and in the second experiment, three different concentrations of LCO (10(-7), 10(-6), and 10(-5) M) were added to the soybean roots subjected to the pH levels of 4, 5, 6, and 7 for 24 h. By microscopy observation, the ratios of RHD were determined. Addition of LCOs resulted in RHD in both cultivars. Maple Glen roots responded similarly to different concentrations of LCO, whereas roots of AC Bravour responded differently. The concentration of 10(-5) M LCO could inhibit the stressful effect of pH 4 on RHD compared with pH 7 in both cultivars. The significant interaction between LCO and pH suggests that the effect of LCO on RHD may be more significant under higher levels of acidity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据