4.8 Review

Biomass to biofuels, a chemical perspective

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 8, 期 10, 页码 861-867

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b605036k

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomass is an interesting starting material for transportation fuels because of its renewable nature. The main constituents of biomass are the carbohydrate polymers cellulose and hemi-cellulose, and lignin. Current transportation fuels are mixtures of mainly hydrocarbons derived from crude oil. Biomass derived biofuels are preferably used as blends with fossil fuels to avoid the need for adaptations in the existing car fleet. The total blend then needs to meet the set fuel specifications for fossil fuels. The conversion of biomass to biofuels therefore centres on the removal of oxygen from carbohydrates to obtain hydrocarbons. Oxygen is preferably eliminated in the form of CO2 or H2O, because the heat of combustion of these molecules is zero and all energy is concentrated in the remaining products. Based on gross chemical formulae, the conversion options from biomass to biofuels have been investigated, and interesting intermediates have been identified. Conversion routes from carbohydrates to hydrocarbons tend to proceed via C-1-intermediates (CO, CH4 and carbon). Gasification and subsequent Fischer Tropsch synthesis seems the logical processing route to obtain hydrocarbons from biomass via these intermediates. If oxygen containing products are allowed, conversion can proceed via larger intermediates. For blending with gasoline, ethanol emerges as an interesting component. Longer carbon chain molecules are required for diesel. These can only be obtained by at least two process steps, involving the combination of carbon chains ( e. g. by etherification or esterification), and reduction of polarity (by hydrogenation or oligomerisation). The lignin present in biomass has a complex, highly cross- linked structure, and can probably best be converted to syngas via gasification or applied directly as solid fuel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据