4.6 Article

Chemical chaperones and permissive temperatures alter the cellular locatization of Gaucher disease associated glucocerebrosidase variants

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 1, 期 4, 页码 235-251

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cb600187q

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK075295] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK075295] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Point mutations in the lysosomal hydrolase, glucocerebrosidase (GC), can cause Gaucher disease, a common lysosomal storage disease. Several clinically important GC mutations impede folding in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and target these enzymes for ER-associated degradation (ERAD). The removal of these misfolded proteins decreases the lysosomal concentration of GC, which results in glucosylceramide accumulation. The most common GC variant, N1370S, and other clinically relevant variants, G202R and L444P, exhibit different cellular localization patterns in patient-derived fibroblasts. We show that these distributions can be altered by manipulation of the ER folding environment, either by chemical chaperones or by temperature shifts. N370S, L444P, and G202R GC are destabilized in the neutral pH environment of the ER, rendering them prone to ERAD. Fibroblasts harboring the G202R and L444P GC mutations grown at 30 degrees C localize the mutant proteins to the lysosome, and this increases total GC activity. Both of these temperature-sensitive mutants appear to be stable at 37 degrees C once they are trafficked to the low pH environment of the lysosome. Chemical chaperones correct the ER instability and significant ER retention of G202R GC. N370S is also destabilized under ER simulating conditions, a deficiency that is corrected by chemical chaperone binding. These data clearly show manipulating the ER environment with chemical chaperones increases the lysosomal concentration of partially active GC variants and suggest that small molecules could be used to treat Gaucher disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据