4.5 Article

Stationary versus fluidized-bed drying of high-moisture paddy with rest period

期刊

DRYING TECHNOLOGY
卷 24, 期 11, 页码 1443-1456

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07373930600952792

关键词

continuous and two stages; diffusion coefficient; energy consumption; fluidized bed; head rice yield; paddy drying; stationary bed

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drying of high-moisture paddy was examined experimentally under stationary and fluidized bed with and without intervening rest periods. Introduction of a rest period between first and second stage of drying improved drying rate and lowered the energy requirement and increased head rice yield. Fluidization further improved the overall drying process. A single-term drying diffusion equation was suitably fitted to first, rest, and second stage drying data of fluidized and stationary bed by applying nonlinear regression method and effective diffusion coefficients were evaluated. During the period of rest stage, paddy grain released a considerable amount of moisture as an effect of residual grain temperature. An appropriate moisture ratio at which resting should start and the length of resting were evaluated by measuring changes in relative humidity in the headspace of mass of paddy and also from the diffusion coefficient values obtained from the experimental drying data. Resting duration between 75 and 90 min at moisture ratio around 0.715 was found suitable for overall good performance in both fluidized and stationary bed drying. A considerable amount of energy (21-44%) can be saved by providing a rest period from 30 to 120 min between the two stages of drying. Fluidization further reduces (approximate to 50% against continuous drying under stationary bed) the energy requirement. No significant difference was found in head rice yield obtained from fluidized and stationary bed experiments, though discontinuing drying by providing intervening rest periods considerably improved the percentage head rice when compared with the results from continuous drying.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据