4.5 Article

Multiplatform genome-wide identification and modeling of functional human estrogen receptor binding sites

期刊

GENOME BIOLOGY
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-9-r82

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Transcription factor binding sites ( TFBS) impart specificity to cellular transcriptional responses and have largely been defined by consensus motifs derived from a handful of validated sites. The low specificity of the computational predictions of TFBSs has been attributed to ubiquity of the motifs and the relaxed sequence requirements for binding. We posited that the inadequacy is due to limited input of empirically verified sites, and demonstrated a multiplatform approach to constructing a robust model. Results: Using the TFBS for the estrogen receptor ( ER)alpha ( estrogen response element [ ERE]) as a model system, we extracted EREs from multiple molecular and genomic platforms whose binding to ER alpha has been experimentally confirmed or rejected. In silico analyses revealed significant sequence information flanking the standard binding consensus, discriminating ERE-like sequences that bind ER alpha from those that are nonbinders. We extended the ERE consensus by three bases, bearing a terminal G at the third position 3' and an initiator C at the third position 5', which were further validated using surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy. Our functional human ERE prediction algorithm ( h-ERE) outperformed existing predictive algorithms and produced fewer than 5% false negatives upon experimental validation. Conclusion: Building upon a larger experimentally validated ERE set, the h-ERE algorithm is able to demarcate better the universe of ERE- like sequences that are potential ER binders. Only 14% of the predicted optimal binding sites were utilized under the experimental conditions employed, pointing to other selective criteria not related to EREs. Other factors, in addition to primary nucleotide sequence, will ultimately determine binding site selection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据