4.8 Article

Tumor Hypoxia Does Not Drive Differentiation of Tumor-Associated Macrophages but Rather Fine-Tunes the M2-like Macrophage Population

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 74, 期 1, 页码 24-30

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1196

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. IWT-Vlaanderen
  2. Stichting Emmanuel van der Schueren
  3. FWO-Vlaanderen
  4. Stichting tegen Kanker
  5. ERC starting grant (OxyMo)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) are exposed to multiple microenvironmental cues in tumors, which collaborate to endow these cells with protumoral activities. Hypoxia, caused by an imbalance in oxygen supply and demand because of a poorly organized vasculature, is often a prominent feature in solid tumors. However, to what extent tumor hypoxia regulates the TAM phenotype in vivo is unknown. Here, we show that the myeloid infiltrate in mouse lung carcinoma tumors encompasses two morphologically distinct CD11b(hi)F4/80(hi)Ly6C(lo) TAM subsets, designated as MHC-IIlo and MHC-IIhi TAM, both of which were derived from tumor-infiltrating Ly6C(hi) monocytes. MHC-IIlo TAM express higher levels of prototypical M2 markers and reside in more hypoxic regions. Consequently, MHC-IIlo TAM contain higher mRNA levels for hypoxia-regulated genes than their MHC-IIhi counterparts. To assess the in vivo role of hypoxia on these TAM features, cancer cells were inoculated in prolyl hydroxylase domain 2 (PHD2)-haplodeficient mice, resulting in better-oxygenated tumors. Interestingly, reduced tumor hypoxia did not alter the relative abundance of TAM subsets nor their M2 marker expression, but specifically lowered hypoxia-sensitive gene expression and angiogenic activity in the MHC-IIlo TAM subset. The same observation in PHD2(+/+) -> PHD2(+/-) bone marrow chimeras also suggests organization of a better-oxygenized microenvironment. Together, our results show that hypoxia is not a major driver of TAM subset differentiation, but rather specifically fine-tunes the phenotype of M2-like MHC-IIlo TAM. (C)2013 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据