4.6 Article

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 4G/5G polymorphism in breast cancer patients and its association with tissue PAI-1 levels and tumor severity

期刊

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
卷 117, 期 5, 页码 487-492

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2005.03.025

关键词

breast cancer; PAI-1 gene; polymorphism; PAI-1; fibrinolysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) 4G/5G polymorphism may have significance for PAI-1 expression. High levels of PAI-1 in breast cancer patients are associated with a poor prognosis. In this study, we analyzed the influence of the PAI-1 4G/5G polymorphism on tissue PAI-1 levels and its association with tumor severity in women with breast cancer. Material and methods: We studied 104 women with breast carcinoma (patient group) and 104 healthy age-matched women (control group). In patients and controls, the PAI-1 4G/5G polymorphism was determined by PCR amplification using allele-specific primers. In patients, PAI-1 levels were quantified in breast cancer tissue by using an ELISA. Results: The frequency of the PAI-1 4G allele tended to be higher in patients than in controls (p=0.062). The presence of the 4G allele (4G/5G plus 4G/4G genotypes) was significantly higher among patients with histological grade 3 tumors than among those with grade 1 tumors (p=0.026). Furthermore, patients with the 4G/4G genotype had significantly higher tissue PAI-1 levels than those with the 5G/5G genotype. Moreover, tissue PAI-1 antigen levels were significantly and positively correlated with tumor severity (p=0.003) and tumor size (p=0.009). However, no significant differences in PAI-1 level were observed in relation to menopause, hormone receptor or nodal status. Conclusion: Tissue PAI-1 antigen levels and tumor severity seem to be associated with the PAI-1 4G/5G polymorphism. Further studies with a larger number of patients are needed to clarify the influence of this polymorphism in breast cancer. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据