4.5 Article

Apoptosis inhibition in ischemic brain by intraperitoneal PTD-BIR3-RING (XIAP)

期刊

NEUROCHEMISTRY INTERNATIONAL
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 50-59

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2005.07.008

关键词

apoptosis; blood brain barrier; ischemia; protein transduction; XIAP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anti-apoptotic treatment is a promising strategy for neuroprotection against various brain injuries resulting from ischemia or neuron degeneration. X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) is regarded as the most effective apoptosis inhibitor, in which C-terminal structure BIR3-RING mainly inhibits caspase-9-dependent apoptosis. In the present study, we fused XIAP (BIR3-RING) to the protein transduction domain (PTD) of antennapedia homeodomain of Drosophila (Amp HD), and then used the oxygen glucose deprivation (OGD)-induced hippocampal slices injury in vitro, and the rat transient middle cerebral artery ischemia (tMCAO) models in vivo, to explore the anti-apoptotic effect of this recombinant protein. The results showed that the PTD could efficiently mediate the transduction of BIR3-RING into the hippocampal slices and rat brains. PTD-BIR3-RING could decrease OGD-induced cell death in brain slices (p < 0.05). Intraperitoneal injection of PTD-BIR3-RING could attenuate terminal deoynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL) positive cells and decrease cleaved caspase-3 in the ischemic bounder zone compared with the control animals (p < 0.05). Further studies showed that ischemia-induced neurological outcomes were improved in rats with PTD-BIR3-RING treatment (p < 0.05). These results demonstrate that PTD-BIR3-RING could attenuate cell death in OGD hippocampal slices and decrease cell apoptosis in tMCAO brains through inhibiting of caspase-3 cleavage, suggesting that PTD-mediated protein transduction provides a novel and effective approach for the therapies of brain diseases such as cerebral ischemia. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据