4.4 Article

Sequential competitive sorption and desorption of chlorophenols in organoclay

期刊

KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 63-70

出版社

KOREAN INSTITUTE CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1007/BF02705693

关键词

chlorophenols; competition; desorption; ideal adsorbed solution theory; organoclay; sorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single- and bi-solute sorption and desorption of 2-chlorophenol (2-CP) and 2,4,5-trichiorophenol (2,4,5-TCP) in montmorillonite modified with hexadecyltrimethyl-ammonium (HDTMA) were investigated by sequential sorption and desorption. Effect of pH on the sequential sorption and desorption was investigated. As expected by the magnitude of octanol : water partition coefficient (K-ow), both sorption and desorption affinity of 2.4,5-TCP was higher than that of 2-CP at pH 4.85 and 9.15. For both chlorophenols, die protonated speciation (at pH 4.85) exhibited a higher affinity in both sorption and desorption than the predominant deprotonated speciation (about 80% and 99% of 2-chlorophenolate and 2,4,5-trichlophenolate anions at pH 9.15, respectively). Desorption of chlorinated phenols was strongly dependent on the current pH regardless of their speciation in the previous sorption stage. Freundlich model was used to analyze the single-solute sorption and desorption data. No appreciable desorption-resistant (or non-desorbing) fraction was observed in organoclays after several sequential desorptions. This indicates that sorption of phenols in organoclay mainly occurs via partitioning into the core of the pseudo-organic medium, thereby causing desorption nearly reversible. In bisolute competitive systems, sorption (or desorption) affinity of both chlorophenols was reduced compared to that in its single-solute system due to the competition between the solutes. The ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) coupled with die single-solute Freundlich model was positively correlated with the bisolute sequential competitive sorption and desorption equilibria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据