4.6 Article

3.0 vs 1.5 T MRI in the detection of focal cartilage pathology - ROC analysis in an experimental model

期刊

OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 63-70

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2005.08.002

关键词

cartilage imaging; MRI; high field; ROC-analysis; experimental study; focal cartilage pathology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To use receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis for assessing the diagnostic performance of three cartilage-specific MR sequences at 1.5 and 3 T in detecting cartilage lesions created in porcine knees. Design: Eighty-four cartilage lesions were created in 27 porcine knee specimens at the patella, the medial and lateral femoral and the medial and lateral tibial cartilage. MR imaging was performed using a fat saturated spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) sequence (in plane spatial resolution/slice thickness: 0.20x0.39 mm(2)/1.5 mm) and two fat saturated proton density weighted (PDw) sequences (low spatial resolution: 0.31x0.47 mm(2)/3 mm and high spatial resolution: 0.20x0.26 mm(2)/2 mm). The images were independently analyzed by three radiologists concerning the absence or presence of lesions using a five-level confidence scale. Significances of the differences for the individual sequences were calculated based on comparisons of areas under ROC curves (A(Z)). Results: The highest A(Z)-values for all three radiologists were consistently obtained for the SPGR (A(Z)=0.84) and the high-resolution (hr) PDw (A(Z)=0.79) sequences at 3 T. The corresponding A(Z)-values at 1.5 T were 0.77 and 0.69; the differences between 1.5 and 3 T were statistically significant (P<0.05). A(Z)-values for the low-resolution PDw sequence were lower: 0.59 at 3 T and 0.55 at 1.5 T and the differences between 1.5 and 3 T were not significant. Conclusion: With optimized hr MR sequences diagnostic performance in detecting cartilage lesions was improved at 3 T. For a standard, lower spatial resolution PDw sequence no significant differences, however, were found. (C) 2005 OsteoArthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据