4.7 Article

Quantitative analysis of Fe-based samples using ultraviolet nanosecond and femtosecond laser ablation-ICP-MS

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
卷 21, 期 11, 页码 1194-1201

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b606988f

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The quanti. cation capabilities of iron-based samples were investigated using three commercially available ultraviolet (UV) nanosecond (ns) and femtosecond ( fs) laser ablation systems coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry ( LA- ICP- MS). A comparison of three pulsed laser ablation systems ( ArF* excimer, Nd: YAG and Ti- sapphire) with different wavelengths and pulse time durations ( 15 ns, 4 ns and 150 fs, respectively) was performed. Minor and trace elements were determined using 57 Fe as internal standard element. Using similar spatial resolution for all laser systems and commonly applied operating conditions for each system, higher ion-signals ( 25 - 30%) and more stable elemental ratios ( 10% TRSD) were obtained for UV- fs- LA- ICP- MS. Scanning electron microscope images and particle size distributions measured for UV- ns- LA systems showed a bimodal distribution formed by nano- sized agglomerates and micro- sized molten spherical particles. In contrast, due to reduced thermal effects achieved using ultra-short pulses, the particle size distribution measured using UV- fs- LA showed a broad monomodal distribution ( nano- sized agglomerates in the range of 50 - 250 nm). Matrix- matched ( within metallic samples) and non- matrix matched calibrations were applied for the analysis of Fe- based samples, using a silicate glass ( SRM NIST 610) as non- matrix matched calibration sample ( glassmetals). Improved analytical results in terms of precision and accuracy were obtained using femtosecond laser ablation when using similar matrices for calibration. Moreover, non- matrix matched calibration used for quanti. cation provides more accurate results ( 5 - 15%) in comparison with both UV- ns- LA- ICP- MS ( 5 - 30% using Nd: YAG laser and 15 - 60% using ArF* laser).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据