4.5 Article

Mutation of Thr466 in SHP2 abolishes its phosphatase activity, but provides a new substrate-trapping mutant

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.11.013

关键词

SHP2; phosphatase; EGFR; substrate trapping

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA028146] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [CA28146] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most classical phosphotyrosyl phosphatases (PTPs), including the Src homology phosphotyrosyl phosphatase 2 (SHP2) possess a Thr or a Ser residue immediately C-terminal to the invariant Arg in the active site consensus motif (H/V-C-X-5-R-S/T), also known as the '' signature motif ''. SHP2 has a Thr (Thr466) at this position, but its importance in catalysis has not been investigated. By employing site-directed mutagenesis, phosphatase assays and substrate-trapping studies, we demonstrate that Thr466 is critical for the catalytic activity of SHP2. Its mutation to Ala abolishes phosphatase activity, but provides a new substrate-trapping mutant. We further show that the nucleophilic Cys459 is not involved in substrate trapping by Thr466Ala-SHP2 (T/A-SHP2). Mutation of Thr466 does not cause significant structural changes in the active site as revealed by the trapping of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the physiological substrate of SHP2, and by orthovanadate competition experiments. Based on these results and previous other works, we propose that the role of Thr466 in the catalytic process of SHP2 could be stabilizing the sulfhydryl group of Cys459 in its reduced state, a state that enables nucleophilic attack on the phosphate moiety of the substrate. The T/A-SHP2 harbors a single mutation and specifically interacts with the EGFR. Since the nucleophilic Cys459 and the proton donor Asp425 are intact in the T/A-SAHP2, it offers an excellent starting material for solving the structure of SHP2 in complex with its physiological substrate. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据