4.8 Article

Vitronectin-αvβ3 Integrin Engagement Directs Hypoxia-Resistant mTOR Activity and Sustained Protein Synthesis Linked to Invasion by Breast Cancer Cells

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 73, 期 14, 页码 4571-4578

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0218

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  2. Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program
  3. NIH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tumor microenvironment is a crucial player in the ability of cancer cells to acquire the ability to survive under the hypoxic environment and promote migration and invasion. Translational regulation is an essential part of cancer development and progression. Protein synthesis consumes considerable cellular metabolic energy and is therefore highly regulated, in turn controlling tumor cell proliferation and survival in extreme tumor-host conditions. Protein synthesis is typically downregulated by hypoxia, impairing cell proliferation and migration. Here, we show that breast cancer cells expressing integrin alpha v beta 3, when engaging the extracellular matrix (ECM) protein vitronectin, strongly upregulate both mTOR activity and cap-dependent mRNA translation, which overrides their inhibition by hypoxia and facilitates tumor cell invasion. Interaction of vitronectin with integrin alpha v beta 3 results in the continued activation of the kinase mTOR despite hypoxia through a mechanism that is dependent on integrin-linked kinase but is independent of focal adhesion kinase. Continuous activation of mTOR despite hypoxia involves release of translation initiation factor eIF4E from its repressor protein 4E-BP1, which is required for vitronectin-mediated tumor cell invasion. As integrin alpha v beta 3 is associated with breast cancer cell invasion and metastasis to bone, we propose that the interaction with specific ECM proteins can influence cancer cell invasion, in part, by hyperactivation of mTOR, thereby promoting and sustaining protein synthesis under hypoxic conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据