4.4 Article

Tissue specificity of methylation and expression of human genes coding for neuropeptides and their receptors, and of a human endogenous retrovirus K family

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 51, 期 5, 页码 440-450

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1007/s10038-006-0382-9

关键词

tissue specificity; DNA methylation; gene expression; dopamine and serotonin receptors; human endogenous retrovirus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of the present study was to understand the tissue specificity of DNA methylation and the relationship between methylation and expression of genes with essential roles in neurodevelopment and brain function. We chose dopamine receptor genes (DRD1 and DRD2), NCAM, and COMT as examples of genes with CpG islands around the promoter region, and serotonin receptor genes (HTR2A and HTR3A), HCRT, and DRD3 as genes without CpG islands. Methylation states were investigated in fetal brain, fetal liver, placenta, and in adult peripheral leukocytes from three individuals by Southern blot and bisulfite-modified DNA sequencing. A repetitive sequence, human endogenous retrovirus (HERV)-K was also examined. All genes examined were almost completely unmethylated in brains. The genes with CpG islands were unmethylated regardless of their expression state. In contrast, genes without CpG islands showed various methylation patterns, which did not necessarily reflect the transcriptional activity of the genes. Most HERV-K loci were methylated, but some loci showed relatively low methylation in the placenta and liver. Interestingly, we found inter-individual differences in methylation levels in HTR2A and HCRT in the placenta and in some loci of HERV-K in the placenta and liver. The sample with the lowest methylation levels in the two unique genes showed higher methylation of HERV-K loci than the other samples. These results provide detailed information about the methylation states of the genes analyzed and evidence for inter-individual variations in methylation in both unique and repetitive sequences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据