4.6 Review

The ACS Virgo Cluster Survey. VI. Isophotal analysis and the structure of early-type galaxies

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
卷 164, 期 2, 页码 334-434

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/501350

关键词

dust, extinction; galaxies : clusters : individual (Virgo); galaxies : ISM; galaxies : elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies : nuclei

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a detailed analysis of themorphology, isophotal parameters, and surface brightness profiles for 100 earlytype members of the Virgo Cluster, from dwarfs (M-B = -15.1 mag) to giants (M-B = -21.8 mag), imaged in the g and z passbands using the Advanced Camera for Surveys on board the Hubble Space Telescope. Dust and complex morphological structures are common. Dust is detected in 42% of galaxies brighter than B-T = 12.15 mag, while kiloparsecscale stellar disk, bars, and nuclear stellar disks are seen in 60% of galaxies with intermediate luminosity. Isophotal parameters are derived typically within 8 kpc from the center for the brightest galaxies, and 1.5 kpc for the faintest systems, with a resolution of 7 pc. For most galaxies, the surface brightness profiles are well described by a Sersic model with index n that increases steadily with the galaxy luminosity; only for 8 of the 10 brightest galaxies are the inner profiles (typically within 100 pc of the center) lower than expected based on an extrapolation of the outer Sersic model, and are better described by a single power-law function. Contrary to previous claims, we find no evidence in support of a strong bimodal behavior of the logarithmic slope of the inner surface brightness profile, gamma; in particular the gamma distribution for galaxies that do not show evidence of multiple morphological components is unimodal across the entire magnitude range spanned by the ACSVCS galaxies. Although the brightest galaxies have shallow inner profiles, the shallowest profiles are found in faint dwarf systems. The widely adopted separation of early-type galaxies between core'' and power-law'' types is questioned based on the present study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据