4.5 Review

2-(4-Aminophenyl) benzothiazole: A potent and selective pharmacophore with novel mechanistic action towards various tumour cell lines

期刊

MINI-REVIEWS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 6, 期 6, 页码 633-637

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/138955706777435706

关键词

2-(4-aminophenyl) benzothiazole; antitumour agents; aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR); cytochrome P-450 isoform CYP1A1; DNA adduct

向作者/读者索取更多资源

2-(4-aminophenyl) benzothiazole (CJM - 126) (Table 1 (1) and its analogues represent a potent and highly selective class of antitumor agents. These compounds in nanomolar range elicit potent growth inhibition in human-derived breast, colon, ovarian and renal tumour cell lines. Metabolism of benzothiazole plays a central role in its mode of action. Cytocrome P450 isoform, CYP1A1, biotransforms benzothiazoles, to active, as well as inactive metabolites. In vitro studies had confirmed that N-oxidation and N-acetylation (only 3' halogen congener) as main active metabolic transformation (generating cytotoxic electrophilic species), while C-6 oxidation and N-acetylation (except 3' halogen congener) as inactive metabolic transformation pathway. Generation of an inactive metabolite 2(4-aminophenyl)-6-hydoxybenzothiazole [6-OH 126, (Table 1) (10)] is blocked by fluorinated analogue, substituted around benzothiazole nucleus, especially at 5-position. National Cancer Institute (NCI), USA, confirms this series as a unique mechanistic class distinct from clinically used chemotherapeutic agents. Benzothiazoles are potent aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonists, binding to AhR results in induction of CYP1A1, causes generation of electrophilic reactive species which forms DNA adduct, ultimately resulting in cell death by activation of apoptotic machinery. To overcome the poor physiochemical and pharmaceutical properties (bioavailability problem) of this compounds, prodrug of benzothiazole derivatives were synthesized, which are introduced in clinical trails.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据