4.4 Article

Risk factors for hospital readmission in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

期刊

RESPIRATION
卷 73, 期 3, 页码 311-317

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000088092

关键词

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; hypercapnia; quality of life; readmission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Hospital readmissions for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are one of the leading causes of healthcare expenditures worldwide. Objectives: To identify risk factors for hospital readmission in COPD patients. Methods: We prospectively evaluated 129 consecutive patients hospitalized for acute exacerbation of COPD. Clinical, spirometric and arterial blood gas variables were measured during hospitalization. Socioeconomic characteristics, comorbidity, dyspnea, functional dependence, depression, social support and quality of life were also analyzed. Readmission was defined as one or more hospitalizations in the following year. Results: During the follow-up period, 75 (58.5%) patients were readmitted. In bivariate analysis, readmission was associated with previous hospitalization for COPD in the past year, dyspnea scale, PaCO2 at discharge, depression, cor pulmonale, chronic domiciliary oxygen and quality of life measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. In multivariate analysis, the best predictor of readmission was the combination of hospitalization for COPD in the previous year (odds ratio, OR: 4.27; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.5-12), the total score of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire 6 50 points (OR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.03-5.04) and PaCO2 at discharge >= 45 mm Hg (OR: 2.18; 95% CI: 0.84-5.06). With this model, the probability of readmission for patients without any of these variables was 7%, while it was 70% for the patients with all three variables present. Conclusion: The combination of quality of life, hospitalization for COPD in the previous year and hypercapnia at discharge are useful predictors of readmission at 1 year. Copyright (C) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据