4.4 Article

Patterns of pulmonary complications associated with sirolimus

期刊

RESPIRATION
卷 73, 期 3, 页码 367-374

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000087945

关键词

sirolimus; rapamycin; pneumonitis; pulmonary vasculitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sirolimus inhibits human fibroblast cell proliferation in cell cultures from transbronchial biopsies of lung transplant recipients. However, a few cases of interstitial pneumonitis and bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia have been recently described in solid organ transplant recipients, including a fatality in a heart transplant recipient. We studied the patterns of pulmonary adverse effects associated with sirolimus in 4 renal transplant recipients who developed pulmonary opacities on chest radiograph, which were proved to be noninfectious in origin. Lung biopsy was performed to obtain histological diagnosis (3 interstitial pneumonitis, 1 necrotizing vasculitis). Symptoms were dyspnea (4), cough (2), hemoptysis (1), fever (1) and eyelid edema (1). Those with interstitial pneumonitis had bilateral basal opacities on chest X-ray, and histopathology showed mild lymphoplasmocytic interstitial inflammation, scattered intraalveolar epitheloid granulomas and a focal pattern of organizing pneumonia. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) was elevated and bronchoalveolar lavage revealed lymphocytosis (77, 79.5 and 31%). The fourth patient had an opacity localized in the upper lobe, which progressed to both the lower lobes, and histopathology showed multifocal necroses of lung tissue with lymphoplasmocytic vasculitis and scattered granulomas. In this patient, the serum CRP level was not elevated and bronchoalveolar lavage was normal. Pulmonary symptoms and opacities on chest radiograph resolved and the serum CRP level became normal after sirolimus was stopped in all patients. Sirolimus may be a cause of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary vasculitis, and withdrawal of sirolimus is therapeutic. Copyright (C) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据