4.3 Article

Systematic review of studies of productivity loss due to rheumatoid arthritis

期刊

OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD
卷 56, 期 1, 页码 18-27

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqi171

关键词

economics; employment; epidemiology; rheumatoid arthritis; risk factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, debilitating disease with a significant impact on workplace productivity. Aim To perform a systematic review of studies of the relationship between RA and reduced workplace productivity. Methods Screening of 307 titles identified in bibliographic database searches resulted in 38 articles subject to systematic review. Productivity loss was expressed by three different measures: work disability, work loss (synonymous with absenteeism or short-term sick leave) and work limitation (reduction in productivity while present at work). Results A median of 66% (range 36-84%) of employed RA subjects experienced work loss due to RA in the previous 12 months, for a median duration of 39 days (range 7-84 days). The times from RA diagnosis until a 50% probability of being work disabled varied from 4.5 to 22 years. In inception cohort studies, the baseline variables consistently predictive of subsequent work disability were a physically demanding work type, more severe RA and older age. Conclusions RA-related work-disability rates were similar in the USA and European countries. An apparent decrease in the prevalence of RA-related work disability since the 1970s may be related to a decrease in physically demanding work rather than to epidemiologic changes in RA. The majority of the literature addresses permanent disability and temporary work loss; none of the studies reviewed reported the effect of RA on presenteeism, i.e. work limitation from the employer perspective, and there are few published studies of the effectiveness of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in reducing work-related productivity loss.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据