4.3 Article

Cyclic loading alters biomechanical properties and secretion of PGE(2) and NO from tendon explants

期刊

CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 99-106

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.008

关键词

overuse injury; tendon; tissue culture; inflammation; prostaglandin; nitric oxide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Tendon overuse injuries are a common occurrence; accounting for a large proportion of occupational and athletic injuries. The concept examined in this study is the role of load-induced intrinsic inflammation to the mechanism of these injuries. This study examined the influence of cyclical loading on the mechanical properties, cell viability, and inflammatory mediators of cultured tendon explants. Methods. Chicken digital flexor tendon explants were isolated and separated into no-load (24 h rest), moderate load (0.25-3.0 MPa, I Hz, 4 h, 20 It rest), and aggressive load (0.25-12.0 MPa, I Hz, 24 h) treatment groups. Tissue loading was carried out with a pneumatic device under load-control. The loading regimens for each explant treatment group started at a uniform time point (day 3 from isolation, t = 0 h). Medium was collected at t = 24 and t = 48 It and analyzed for the inflammatory mediators prostaglandin E, and nitric oxide. Viability was evaluated at t = 48 h. Findings. Biomechanical data revealed a significantly (P < 0.05) lower strength in the aggressively loaded specimens compared to the moderately loaded samples. Prostaglandin E-2 concentrations of aggressively loaded samples showed significantly higher values compared to moderately loaded samples at t = 48 h. Nitric oxide concentrations were greater in the moderately loaded samples relative to the no-load group at t = 24 h. Viability was not found to differ among the groups. Interpretation. Alterations in cyclical loading of tendon may cause a change in fibroblast-mediated inflammatory mediator production in tendon. This response is of clinical significance as it may have a role in the pathology of tendon overuse injuries. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据