4.6 Article

Variation in genes involved in the RANK/RANK/OPG bone remodeling pathway are associated with bone mineral density at different skeletal sites in men

期刊

HUMAN GENETICS
卷 118, 期 5, 页码 568-577

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00439-005-0062-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR045651] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR045651] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to assess the contribution of polymorphisms in the RANKL (TNFSF11), RANK (TNFRSF11A) and OPG (TNFRSF11B) genes to variations in bone mineral density (BMD), a population-based cohort with 1,120 extreme low hip BMD cases or extreme high hip BMD controls was genotyped on five SNPs. We further explored the associations between these genetic variations and forearm BMDs by genotyping 266 offspring and 309 available parents from 160 nuclear families. A family-based association test was used. Significantly positive associations were found for A163G polymorphisms in the promoter regions of the OPG gene, a missense substitution in exon 7 (Ala192-Val) of the RANK gene and rs9594782 SNP in the 5' UTR of the RANKL gene with BMD in men only. Men with TC/CC genotypes of the rs9594782 SNP had a 2.1 times higher risk of extremely low hip BMD (P = 0.004), and lower whole body BMD (P < 0.001). Subjects with the TC genotype of the Ala192Val polymorphism had a 40% reduced risk of having extremely low hip BMD (P < 0.01), and higher whole body BMD (P < 0.01). Subjects with the GG genotype of the A163G polymorphism had a 70% reduced risk of having extremely low hip BMD (P < 0.05), and higher whole body BMD (P < 0.01). Significant gene-gene interactions were also observed among the OPG, RANK and RANKL genes. Our findings suggest that genetic variation in genes involved in the RANKL/RANK/OPG bone remodeling pathway are strongly associated with BMD at different skeletal sites in adult men, but not in women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据