4.3 Article

Murine TLR4 is implicated in cigarette smoke-induced pulmonary inflammation

期刊

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000095462

关键词

pulmonary inflammation; dendritic cells; cytokines; chemokines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with an abnormal inflammatory response of the lungs to noxious particles or gases. We investigated whether Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is implicated in cigarette smoke (CS)-induced pulmonary inflammation in a murine model of COPD. Methods: C3H/HeOuJ (Tlr4(WT)) and C3H/HeJ (Tlr4(defective)) mice were exposed to air or CS for 5 weeks (subacute) and 26 weeks (chronic), and pulmonary inflammation was evaluated. Results: In Tlr4(WT) mice, subacute and chronic CS exposure induced a substantial pulmonary infiltration of macrophages, neutrophils, lymphocytes and dendritic cells (DCs), that was absent in air-exposed mice. CS exposure increased the costimulatory marker expression on DCs, the levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and induced the pulmonary expression of matrix metalloproteinase-12 (MMP-12), TLR4 and TLR2. In contrast, after subacute CS exposure, TIN defective mice showed a limited (5-fold lower) increase of DCs and lymphocytes in BAL fluid, lower costimulatory marker expression on DCs and lower MCP-1 and TNF-alpha levels in BAL fluid compared to Tlr4(WT) animals. After chronic CS exposure, however, the difference in pulmonary inflammation between Tlr4WT and Tlr(defective) mice was less pronounced and both strains showed similar MCP-1 and TNF-alpha levels in BAL and similar pulmonary MMP-12, TLR4 and TLR2 expression. Conclusions: We demonstrated that the TLR4 mutation in C3H/HeJ mice is protective against CS-induced pulmonary influx of neutrophils, DCs and lymphocytes upon subacute CS exposure. However, TLR4 is only of minor importance in chronic CS-induced inflammation in mice. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据