4.7 Article

Purification of mitotic spindles from cultured human cells

期刊

METHODS
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 25-28

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.07.006

关键词

mitosis; spindle; cell synchronisation; cell cycle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In eukaryotes, both chromosome segregation and the determination of the cell division cleavage plane depend on the mitotic spindle apparatus. Spindle malfunctioning can lead to chromosome mis-segregation and cytokinesis defects and hence result in aneuploidy. Thus, the understanding of the structure and function of mitotic spindles is of interest not only from the perspective of basic science, but has implications also for human health and disease. Until recently, this complex microtubule-based structure was studied mainly by cell biological techniques in mammalian cells, by biochemical assays in Xenopus egg extracts, and by genetic approaches in genetically tractable organisms such as yeast, flies, and nematodes. With the rapid development of mass spectrometry and its increasing application to biological problems, it has become possible to subject highly complex structures, such as the mitotic spindle apparatus, to proteornics approaches. Such studies require the isolation of the mitotic spindle, or its substructures, in sufficient amounts and free of excessive contaminants. A number of methods for the isolation of mitotic spindles from mammalian tissue culture cells have been developed in the past. We have compared these methods and found that protocols based on the stabilization of microtubules by taxol were most efficient and reproducible. Here, we describe the further optimization of a taxol-based method, originally developed by Zieve and Solomon [Cell 28 (1982) 233-242], and its application to the isolation of human mitotic spindles at a scale suitable for mass spectrometric analysis [G. Sauer, R. Korner, A. Hanisch, A. Ries, E.A. Nigg, H.H.W. Sille, Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4 (2005) 35-43]. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据