4.3 Review

Magnetic resonance evaluation of the cerebral circulation in obstructive arterial disease

期刊

CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
卷 21, 期 5-6, 页码 297-306

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000091534

关键词

magnetic resonance imaging; cerebral blood flow; steno-occlusive disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The aim of the current overview is to highlight the possibilities of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of patients with obstructive arterial disease. The anatomic and hemodynamic aspects of the extra- and intracranial cerebral circulation were analyzed and show the importance of combining both aspects in studying cerebral hemodynamic changes. Results: Three levels of cerebral circulation are distinguished: blood flow to the brain (level 1); the distribution of blood flow in the brain (level 2), and finally perfusion of the brain (level 3). To investigate the anatomy of the arteries in the neck and the circle of Willis, contrast-enhanced, time-of-flight and phase contrast MR angiography (MRA) are available. To evaluate the hemodynamics at the 1st and 2nd level of the cerebral circulation two-dimensional phase contrast (volume flow and flow direction) MRA can be used. In addition, the distribution of blood via the circle of Willis can be visualized with dynamic MRA. At the 3rd level, measurements of regional brain perfusion can be obtained by injecting gadolinium, dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI, or noninvasively with arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI. In addition, selective ASL MRI is able to evaluate the perfused territories of individual brain-feeding arteries. Conclusion: The currently available MR techniques allow evaluation of the cerebral circulation from the aortic arch upwards towards the microvasculature and brain tissue perfusion in a comprehensive 20-min protocol. The combined use of the described MR methods in patients with steno-occlusive disease will further clarify the pathophysiological relations between the vasculature, perfusion and brain function. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据