4.5 Article

Determination of the source area of the Ya13-1 gas pool in the Qiongdongnan Basin, South China Sea

期刊

ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY
卷 37, 期 9, 页码 990-1002

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2006.06.001

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Ya13-1 gas field is the largest and earliest commercial gas field discovered in the Qiongdongnan Basin, South China Sea. Recent work has indicated the gas source to be a series of black mudstones in the Yacheng Formation of Eocene-Oligocene age in the Yanan Depression, Qiongdongnan Basin. However, there are no data indicating the effective source area. In this paper, methane generation kinetics and carbon isotopic fractionation kinetics were combined with fluid inclusion data to investigate the effective source area and gas migration and accumulation efficiency. Fluid inclusions from the gas reservoir rocks homogenize in the range of 118-173 degrees C. By combining the fluid inclusion data with the thermal history of the reservoir, the filling of the gas pool is deduced to have occurred from 2 Mabp to present. The results from geological models of gas generation and methane carbon isotopic fractionation of the source rock vary widely from the depression center to the position of the structure. The source rock has a methane fractional conversion ranging from 0.10 to 1.0, and the generated gas has predicted delta C-13(1) values in the range from -26.0 parts per thousand to -42.0 parts per thousand. Compared with the delta C-13(1) values of gas from the gas pool, these models indicate that an effective gas source rock area is located in the slope area of the Yanan Depression, with a present burial depth of 4000-5500 m. On this basis, a model showing the gas generation, migration and accumulation for the Ya13-1 gas pool is proposed. It is believed that the methods and the models developed in this paper are important guides to further research and exploration for natural gases in the Yinggehai-Qiongdongnan Basin. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据