4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

A large-scale survey of races of Leptosphaeria maculans occurring on oilseed rape in France

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY
卷 114, 期 1, 页码 53-65

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10658-005-2104-0

关键词

avirulence gene; blackleg disease; gene-for-gene relationship; Phoma lingam; resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nine avirulence genes (AvrLm1-AvrLm9) were identified in Leptosphaeria maculans, the causal agent of stem canker of oilseed rape (OSR), combinations of which could theoretically generate up to 512 different races of the fungus. L. maculans displays a high evolutionary potential to adapt to novel resistance genes as illustrated by the Rlm1 breakdown in France, where virulent populations became prevalent within three growing seasons. An improved knowledge of the race structure of the fungal population is therefore needed to ensure a better use of available major resistance genes. The objective of this study was to characterise the L. maculans population structure in France using a large-scale, rationalised sample of isolates. Experimental fields, planted with trap plants harbouring no major resistance gene, were sown at 20 locations. Single-pycnidium isolates were collected from leaf lesions that developed in early autumn and 1797 isolates were genotyped at Avr loci. The frequency of AvrLm6 and AvrLm7 was higher than 99%, whereas avrLm2 and avrLm9 alleles were fixed in the population. AvrLm1, AvrLm4, AvrLm5 and AvrLm8 were polymorphic. AvrLm3 isolates were detected at a very low frequency (less than 1%). Only 11 races were identified in France, with one race prevalent, namely Av5-6-7-(8) (i.e. virulent on Rlm1, Rlm2, Rlm3, Rlm4 and Rlm9), representing around 65% of the population. Disparities between the locations sampled were evident at all scales analysed. Some virulent races, such as those harbouring avrLm5, were present before the introduction of the corresponding resistance gene in the commercial OSR crop.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据