3.8 Article

A risk assessment approach in selecting environmental performance indicators

期刊

MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 126-139

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/14777830610650456

关键词

Risk assessment; Environmental Management; Performance measures

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose-The aim of the paper is to propose a method that may assist organisations in the task of selecting appropriate indicators for their environmental performance evaluation procedures. Design/methodology/approach-The proposed method is based on the principles of risk assessment, a key technique in the protection and management of the environment. When well-constructed, it may cover all aspects of an organisation's activities, thus providing a sound base for the identification of the most significant indicators to be considered for the environmental performance evaluation. Findings-The proposed approach starts from an initial set of numerous indicators. Each indicator is identified in order to monitor and assess the progress towards the achievement of a goal that has been set in relation to a particular environmental aspect of the activities of the considered organisation. For each indicator, a related environmental risk is assessed that may then be used to prioritise the indicators, and identify the most significant ones as far as the environmental aspects of the considered organisation are concerned. Originality/value-Despite the fact that the environmental performance evaluation has been considered to be both significant and useful, the approaches proposed, so far, are very generic and do not provide actual assistance to the organisations that wish to adopt and apply such procedures. The main advantage of the proposed methodology lies exactly at this point. It facilitates the process of environmental performance evaluation providing substantial assistance to one of the most important stages that is to decide which particular indicators will be considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据