3.8 Article

Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Dwell Times A Comparison of 3 Securement Methods for Implementation of a 96-Hour Scheduled Change Protocol

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFUSION NURSING
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 14-17

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00129804-200601000-00004

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A prospective, sequential clinical trial was undertaken to determine whether any of 3 methods of peripheral IV catheter (PIV) securement could extend the average survival time of such catheters sufficiently to allow the implementation of a 96-hour PIV change-protocol. Nonsterile tape, StatLock, and HubGuard were evaluated. The use of nonsterile tape securement resulted in an 8% PIV survival rate, HubGuard produced a 9% PIV survival rate, and Statlock produced a 52% PIV survival rate (P < .001). Although this study was not a randomized, controlled trial, it strongly suggests that a mechanical catheter securement device, as opposed to tape or die-cut tape, can render practicable the implementation of the 96-hour PIV change protocol that was sanctioned by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据