4.2 Article

Methylated tumor-specific DNA as a plasma biomarker in patients with glioma

期刊

CANCER INVESTIGATION
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 35-40

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07357900500449546

关键词

biomarker; epigenetics; glioma; polymerase chain reaction

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Patients with systemic malignancies have substantial quantities of tumor-specific DNA in their plasma which may serve as a potential biomarker for tumor burden. This approach has not been studied in gliomas. Methods: Methylation specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) was used to determine the methylation status the promoters for p16/(INK4a) , MGMT, p73, and RAR ss within glioma tissue and plasma. Blood was collected prior to craniotomy in 10 patients with glioma. DNA was extracted from tumor and plasma samples and assayed with MSP. Total plasma DNA also was quantified. Tumor-specific plasma DNA was defined as identification of the same methylated promoter (MP) in both tumor and plasma. Results: Total plasma DNA concentration was markedly elevated (mean 6,503 ng/ml, SEM 1,400 ng/ml). Glioma tissue contained methylation of at least one promoter in 9 out of 10 (90 percent) of patients studied. Of these patients, 6 out of 9 (67 percent) demonstrated methylation of at least one of the same promoters in plasma. Five of these had one MP identified in the plasma and one had 2 MP. Overall, glioma-specific plasma DNA was present in plasma of 6 out of 10 (60 percent) of patients. Each MP DNA marker found in the plasma also was present in the intracranial tumor. Conclusions: Patients with high grade gliomas have large amounts of DNA in the plasma. Of these primary brain tumors, 90 percent contained methylated gene promoters, and in over 60 percent of these patients the same methylated promoters present in the tumor also were found in the plasma. This represents the first step to developing a quantitative plasma biomarker that could be used to monitor glioma status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据