4.3 Review

Rationale and safety of anti-interleukin-23 and anti-interieukin-17A therapy

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 245-252

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.qco.0000224818.42729.67

关键词

interlukin-12; interlukin-17A; interlukin-23; mycobacteria; Salmonella

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Interleukin-12 is a heterodimeric cytokine and an important mediator of the cellular immune response. The recent discovery of the novel cytokine interleukin-23 has led to a reevaluation of interleukin-12 biology, as both cytokines and the infection risks associated with targeting these cytokine pathways during treatment of inflammatory diseases. Recent findings Recent work has shown that interleukin-23 stimulates the development of a distinct subset of effector T cells that produce interleukin-17A. These interleukin-17A-producing cells are critical mediators of the inflammatory response in several mouse models of autoimmunity. Although it is well established that interleukin-12 is a critical mediator of host defense, the role of the interleukin-23/interleukin-17A axis during infections has only recently been evalulated. Summary Interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 have distinct roles in mediating host defense and autoimmune inflammation. Although targeting interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 simultaneously against the common p40 subunit is efficacious in clinical trials for human autoimmune diseases, targeting of interleukin-23 alone or the downstream effector cytokine interleukin-17A may be an effective treatment strategy for organ-specific autoimmune diseases, targeting of interleukin-23 alone or the downstream effector cytokine interleukin-17A may be an effective treatment strategy for organ-specific autoimmune diseases. It is likely that targeting interleukin-23 or interleukin-17A alone, as opposed to targeting interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 together, will reduce the patients' risk of developing treatment-related infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据