4.6 Review

Counterclockwise rotation of late Eocene-Oligocene fore-arc deposits in southern Peru and its significance for oroclinal bending in the central Andes

期刊

TECTONICS
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2005TC001882

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The results of a paleomagnetic study along the fore arc of southern Peru (15-18 degrees S) and northern Chile (18-19 degrees S) are reported from middle to late Miocene ignimbrites (7 sites), late Oligocene to early Miocene ignimbrites (72 sites), Paleogene sediments (20 sites), and Mesozoic and Paleocene volcanics and intrusions (31 sites). Comparison of locality-mean directions with expected paleomagnetic directions indicates vertical axis rotations ranging from 5.2 +/- 11.3 degrees clockwise to 55.6 +/- 7.0 degrees counterclockwise. Spatially, the magnitude of counterclockwise rotations increases northward from similar to 0 degrees within the Chilean fore arc south of 18 degrees 30'S to >45 degrees north of 16 degrees 30'S. In southern Peru, paleomagnetic rotations recorded in Paleogene red beds decrease from late Eocene to late Oligocene, whereas Miocene ignimbrites display no evidence of rotation. These new results confirm that the rotations recorded in the fore arc of southern Peru were acquired at least before similar to 15 Ma, and probably before 25 Ma, and thus prior to the late Neogene shortening of the sub-Andes. The onset of major Andean shortening in the Eastern Cordillera during the latest Eocene-earliest Oligocene is interpreted to have triggered the bending of the Peruvian fore arc. The region of the Peruvian fore arc with the largest rotations appears to be the fore-arc counterpart of the Abancay deflection, a remarkable NE-SW offset in the axis of the Eastern Cordillera induced by a major regional preorogenic structure. We underline that the Abancay deflection should be seen as the northwestern boundary, and therefore as a key element, of the Bolivian Orocline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据