4.8 Article

IKK-ε Coordinates Invasion and Metastasis of Ovarian Cancer

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 72, 期 21, 页码 5494-5504

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3993

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program, CCR, NCI
  2. NIH [K99CA151746]
  3. Norwegian Cancer Society and Health Region of South-Eastern Norway
  4. NCI, NIH [HSN261200800001E]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inhibitor of I kappa B kinases (IKK) are key regulators of NF-kappa B signaling. Three IKK isoforms-alpha, beta, and epsilon-have been linked to oncogenesis, yet the precise components of NF-kappa B signaling in ovarian cancer have not yet been dissected. We surveyed 120 ovarian cancer specimens for IKK-epsilon expression. Notably, cytoplasmic expression was elevated in metastatic lesions relative to primary tumors (P=0.03). Therefore, we hypothesized that IKK-epsilon drives ovarian cancer metastasis. IKK-epsilon was identified previously as a breast cancer oncogene and was associated with poor clinical outcome in ovarian cancer. We now define an ovarian cancer-specific IKK-epsilon-regulated gene expression signature using stably expressed short hairpin RNA targeting IKK-epsilon. Pathway analysis of the signature indicated that IKK-epsilon regulates expression of genes involved in cell motility and inflammation. We further showed that IKK-epsilon depletion in metastatic ovarian cancer cell lines decreased growth, adhesion, and invasion. Consistently, human xenografts depleted of IKK-epsilon in mice showed decreased aggressiveness, whereas overexpression of IKK-epsilon in a less invasive ovarian cancer cell line increased metastasis in vivo. Taken together, these data provide evidence that IKK-epsilon is a key coordinator of invasion and metastasis programs in ovarian cancer. Inhibition of IKK-epsilon signaling thus emerges as a viable therapeutic strategy in women whose ovarian cancer shows aberrant activation of this pathway. Cancer Res; 72(21); 5494-504. (C)2012 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据