4.8 Article

A Preclinical Mouse Model of Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer Metastasis

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 73, 期 1, 页码 353-363

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-4208

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Dutch Cancer Society (KWF) [2006-3715, 2011-5004]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [VIDI 917.96.307]
  3. Association for International Cancer Research (AICR) [11-0677]
  4. NWO
  5. Worldwide Cancer Research [11-0677] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metastatic disease accounts for more than 90% of cancer-related deaths, but the development of effective antimetastatic agents has been hampered by the paucity of clinically relevant preclinical models of human metastatic disease. Here, we report the development of a mouse model of spontaneous breast cancer metastasis, which recapitulates key events in its formation and clinical course. Specifically, using the conditional K14cre; Cdh1(F/F); Trp53(F/F) model of de novo mammary tumor formation, we orthotopically transplanted invasive lobular carcinoma (mILC) fragments into mammary glands of wild-type syngeneic hosts. Once primary tumors were established in recipient mice, we mimicked the clinical course of treatment by conducting a mastectomy. After surgery, recipient mice succumbed to widespread overt metastatic disease in lymph nodes, lungs, and gastrointestinal tract. Genomic profiling of paired mammary tumors and distant metastases showed that our model provides a unique tool to further explore the biology of metastatic disease. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant intervention studies using standard-of-care chemotherapeutics showed the value of this model in determining therapeutic agents that can target early-and late-stage metastatic disease. In obtaining a more accurate preclinical model of metastatic lobular breast cancer, our work offers advances supporting the development of more effective treatment strategies for metastatic disease. Cancer Res; 73(1); 353-63. (C)2012 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据