期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
卷 29, 期 1-3, 页码 107-136出版社
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01900690500409005
关键词
business improvement districts; downtown revitalization; policy tools; private governments; public-private partnerships; special districts
Business improvement districts (BIDs)-special districts usually governed by business and property owners-have been portrayed by some observers as private governments serving narrow commercial interests and by others as policy tools-instruments employed by states and general-purpose local governments to mobilize resources and advance public purposes. We use data from case law, case studies of local practices, and a statewide survey of New Jersey's BIDs to argue that they can best be understood as genuine public-private partnerships that serve simultaneously as instruments of public policy which advance general public interests and as self-help entities which serve more particular interests.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据