3.8 Article

Private Governments or Public Policy Tools? The Law and Public Policy of New Jersey's Special Improvement Districts

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
卷 29, 期 1-3, 页码 107-136

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01900690500409005

关键词

business improvement districts; downtown revitalization; policy tools; private governments; public-private partnerships; special districts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Business improvement districts (BIDs)-special districts usually governed by business and property owners-have been portrayed by some observers as private governments serving narrow commercial interests and by others as policy tools-instruments employed by states and general-purpose local governments to mobilize resources and advance public purposes. We use data from case law, case studies of local practices, and a statewide survey of New Jersey's BIDs to argue that they can best be understood as genuine public-private partnerships that serve simultaneously as instruments of public policy which advance general public interests and as self-help entities which serve more particular interests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据