4.3 Article

Contextual life stress and coping strategies as predictors of adjustment to breast cancer survivorship

期刊

ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 235-244

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1207/s15324796abm3203_10

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA063028] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [R01- CA63028] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Purpose: The study presented here examined the influence of contextual life stress and coping strategies on change in adjustment over the year following completion of treatment for breast cancer We also investigated whether contextual stressful life events moderate the relationship between coping strategies and adjustment, such that cancer-specific emotional approach coping processes would predict better psychosocial outcomes only in the context of lower life stress and would have less impact on adaptation in the context of heightened life stress. Methods: In a sample of women (n = 558) who had recently completed treatment for nonmetastatic breast cancer and were part of a psychoeducational intervention trial to facilitate the transition to survivorship, life stress in the year prior to study entry cancer-specific coping strategies, and general and cancer-specific adjustment were assessed at baseline, and adjustment outcomes (i.e., vitality, depressive symptoms, cancer-specific distress, personal growth) also were assessed at 6-inonth (n = 417) and 12-month (n = 397) follow-up. Results/Conclusions: Although cross-sectional relationships between life stress and adjustment were demonstrated, findings suggest that contextual life stress does not appear to have a direct influence on change in adjustment in the first year after breast cancer treatment. Instead, life stress interacted with cancer-specific coping to predict adjustment, such that cancer-specific emotional approach coping Was adaptive only under conditions of low contextual life stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据