4.6 Article

Panic disorder and suicidal ideation in primary care

期刊

DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 11-16

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/da.20092

关键词

depression; major depressive disorder; primary care; panic disorder; suicide; suicidal ideation; minority populations

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH072833] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH072833] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether panic disorder (PD) and suicidal ideation are associated in all inner-city primary care clinic and whether this association remains significant after controlling for commonly co-occurring psychiatric disorders. We surveyed 2,043 patients attending a primary care clinic using the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) Patient Health Questionnaire, a screening instrument that yields provisional diagnoses of selected psychiatric disorders. We estimated the prevalence of current suicidal ideation and of common psychiatric disorders including panic disorder and major depression. A provisional diagnosis of current PD was received by 12 7 patients (6.2%). After adjusting for potential confounders (age, gender, major depressive disorder [MDD], generalized anxiety disorder and substance use disorders), patients with PD were about twice as likely to present with current suicidal ideation, as compared to those without PD (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-3.18; P=.03). After adjusting for PD and the above-mentioned potential confounders, patients with MDD bad a sevenfold increase in the odds of suicidal ideation, as compared to those without MDD (AOR = 7.00; 95% CI: 4.42-11.08; P <.0001). Primary care patients with PD are at high risk for suicidal ideation, and patients with PD and co-occurring MDD are at especially high risk. PD patients in primary care thus should be assessed routinely for suicidal ideation and depression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据