4.7 Review

Cognitive effects of immediate-release methylphenidate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
卷 30, 期 8, 页码 1225-1245

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.10.002

关键词

attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; stimulant medication; methylphenidate; neuropsychology; cognition; executive function; response inhibition; inhibitory control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A growing body of literature has examined the cognitive effects of immediate-release methylphenidate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, a clear Understanding of the types and magnitude of such effects are difficult to discern from such a large and varied collection Of published reports. This review evaluated a total of 40 relevant placebo-controlled Studies published since Rapport and Kelly's [1993. Psychostimulant effects on learning and cognitive function. In: Matson, J.L.. (Ed.), Handbook of Hyperactivity in Children. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, pp. 97-136] Original review of cognitive effects of methylphenidate in children with ADHD. Of these published studies, 63.5% identified some improvement in cognitive function following methylphenidate treatment. Methylphenidate improved performance on saccadic eye movement, planning/cognitive flexibility, attention/vigilance, and inhibitory control tasks in 83.3%, 71.4%, 70.6%, and 69.7% of studies, respectively. A total 58.3% and 50% Of Studies that evaluated the effect of methylphenidate on tasks of memory and working memory/divided attention, respectively, noted improvement. Variability of findings across Studies may be explained by differential effects of methylphenidate on brain function, intra- and inter-individual variability in medication response, methodological limitations, and problems associated with repeated neuropsychological assessment and metric properties of commonly utilised neuropsychological instruments.. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据