4.2 Article

Impaired expression of cardiac adiponection in leptin-deficient mice with viral myocarditis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL
卷 47, 期 1, 页码 107-123

出版社

INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL ASSOCIATION
DOI: 10.1536/ihj.47.107

关键词

adiponectin; leptin deficiency; viral myocarditis; cardiomyocyte

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A mouse model of encephalomyocarditis (EMC) virus-induced myocarditis was used to investigate the expression of adiponectin in damaged cardiomyocytes. We intraperitoneally injected EMC virus into leptin-deficient ob/ob (OB) mice and wild-type (WT) mice. OB mice were divided into two subgroups consisting of mice with no intervention and mice receiving leptin replacement starting simultaneously With viral inoculation. We determined differences in heart weight, cardiac histological score, numbers of infiltrating and apoptotic cells in the myocardium, expression levels of adiponectin and TNF-alpha mRNA in the heart, adiponectin immunoreactivity in myocytes, adiponectin and TNF-a concentrations in the heart, and immunoreactivity of adiponectin receptors in myocytes between OB mice and WT mice. There was significantly decreased adiponectin mRNA expression, immunoreactivity, and protein level in the heart, and reduced immunoreactivity of adiponectin receptor 1 in myocytes from OB mice on days 4 and 8 after viral inoculation as compared with those in WT mice, together with increased cardiac weight, severe inflammatory myocardial damage, and increased levels of cardiac TNF-alpha mRNA and protein. Replacement of leptin in OB mice inhibited the development of severe myocarditis through augmentation of adiponectin mRNA, immunoreactivity, and protein level, increased adiponectin receptor 1 immunoreactivity in myocytes, and suppressed levels of TNF-alpha mRNA and protein. These results Suggest that impaired expression of cardiac adiponectin may contribute to the progression of viral myocarditis through enhanced expression of TNF-alpha under a leptin-deficient condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据