4.4 Article

Adsorption characteristics of fumaric acid onto weakly basic hypercrosslinked polystyrene ion-exchangers

期刊

ADSORPTION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 65-77

出版社

MULTI SCIENCE PUBL CO LTD
DOI: 10.1260/026361706778062559

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new weakly basic ion-exchanger (called XC-11), with a hypercrosslinked macroporous polystyrene matrix and a high specific surface area, was synthesized. When traditional weakly basic ion-exchange resins were employed in adsorption experiments, it was found that their sphericity after attrition decreased drastically when they were used ten times cyclically to adsorb and desorb famaric acid from actual manufacturing effluent. This indicated that a traditional weakly basic exchange resin could not be applied in practice for the recovery of fumaric acid from industrial wastewater. However, the mechanical strengths of the self-synthesized new weakly basic ion-exchanger XC-11 and the hypercrosslinked polymeric adsorbent NDA-150 remained virtually unchanged under the same conditions, indicating their feasibility for practical applications. Thus, the adsorption of fumaric acid from aqueous solutions onto XC-11 and the commercially available hypercrosslinked polymeric adsorbent (NDA-150) taken as a reference was investigated from both a dynamic and thermodynamic standpoint. Favourable adsorption behaviour towards fumaric acid was observed with both adsorbents, the equilibrium adsorption data obtained being very well fitted by the Freundlich model. ne corresponding Freundlich constants, K, and free energy changes, Delta G, indicated that the adsorption capacity of XC-11 towards fumaric acid was greater than that of NDA-150.The pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models were applied to describe the kinetic data, with the pseudo-second-order model providing a perfect fit. It was also found that the adsorption of fumaric acid onto XC-11 proceeded faster than the corresponding process onto NDA-150.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据