4.3 Review

Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research - Common errors and some comment on improved practice

期刊

EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT
卷 66, 期 3, 页码 393-416

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0013164405282485

关键词

exploratory factor analysis (EFA); factor retention; meta-analysis; confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Given the proliferation of factor analysis applications in the literature, the present article examines the use of factor analysis in current published research across four psychological journals. Notwithstanding ease of analysis due to computers, the appropriate use of factor analysis requires a series of thoughtful researcher judgments. These judgments directly affect results and interpretations. The authors examine across studies (a) the decisions made while conducting exploratory factor analyses (N = 60) and (b) the information reported from the analyses. In doing so, they present a review of the current status of factor analytic practice, including comment on common errors in use and reporting. Recommendations are proffered for future practice as regards analytic decisions and reporting in empirical research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据