4.3 Article

Sildenafil improves hemodynamic parameters in COPD - an investigation of six patients

期刊

PULMONARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 19, 期 6, 页码 386-390

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2005.09.006

关键词

COPD; pulmonary hypertension; phosphodiesterase inhibitor; sildenafil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an important predictor of mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor sildenafil has been demonstrated to reduce pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) in different diseases. We wanted to investigate the effect of sildenafil on hemodynamic parameters and the 6-min walk test (6 MWT) in six patients with severe COPD and echocardiographically estimated PH. A 6 MWT was performed and hemodynamic parameters were measured by right heart catheterization before and 1 and 12 h after injection of 50 mg sildenafil intravenously. A 3-months period of peroral sildenafil therapy 50 mg twice daily followed and finally hemodynamic parameters and a 6 MWT were repeated. Intravenously applied sildenafil could be demonstrated to reduce PAP and pulmonary vasculature resistance (PVR) significantly. And after 3 months of oral sildenafil, the mean PAP has decreased from 30.2 +/- 5.5 mmHg (range: 24-39 mmHg) to 24.6 +/- 4.2 mmHg (range: 20-30 mmHg) (p = 0.01). The PVR has decreased from 401 +/- 108 dyn s cm(-5) (range: 266-558dyn s cm(-5)) to 264 +/- 52 dyn s cm-5 (range: 204-333 dyn s cm(-5)) (P < 0.05). Physical conditions improved: the 6-min walk distance increased from 351 +/- 49 to 433 +/- 52 m. In conclusion, in six patients suffering from severe COPD we could demonstrate significantly improved hemodynamic parameters after 50 mg sildenafil intravenous application. And after 3 months of oral sildenafil, walking distance in the 6 MWT increased significantly as well as hemodynamic parameters in the five patients who had accepted a second right heart catheterization. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据