4.4 Article

Differentiation status of human renal proximal and distal tubular epithelial cells in vitro: Differential expression of characteristic markers

期刊

CELLS TISSUES ORGANS
卷 184, 期 1, 页码 16-22

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000096947

关键词

in vitro differentiation; human renal tubule function; distal tubular cells; proximal tubular cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The culture of human renal tubular cells of well-defined nephron origin is an important basis in the research of various physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms in the kidney. In vitro differentiation of cultured cells is affected by cell isolation and culture conditions. Our study describes in vitro differentiation of cultured human renal proximal and distal (thick ascending limb and early distal) tubular epithelial cells. Methods: Proximal tubular cells (PTC) and early distal tubular cells (DTC) were isolated immunomagnetically and cultured. In vitro differentiation was assessed by Western blot analysis and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction using characteristic markers. Morphologic characterization was shown by fluorescence and scanning electron microscopy. Results: E-cadherin was highly expressed in DTC, whereas expression was low in PTC. In contrast to DTC, in PTC, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and aquaporin 1 were constitutively expressed at high levels. Both cell types expressed cytokeratin 18 and Na-K-ATPase but not alpha-smooth muscle actin. Morphological analysis showed that PTC develop long microvilli, whereas DTC formed short microvilli in culture, and both express the tight junction protein zona occludens protein 1. Conclusions: We demonstrate differential expression of E-cadherin, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and aquaporin 1 in cultured PTC and DTC as described for the renal tubule in vivo. We could show the in vitro differentiation of the cells, and thus, their usefulness as an in vitro model of the human proximal and early distal tubule. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据