4.2 Article

Single cell volume measurement by quantitative phase microscopy (QPM): A case study of erythrocyte morphology

期刊

CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 17, 期 5-6, 页码 193-200

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000094124

关键词

quantitative phase microscopy; erythrocyte; osmolality; refractive index; tonicity; rat; optical thickness; image analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The measurement of the volume of intact, viable cells presents challenging problems in many areas of experimental and diagnostic science involved in the evaluation of cellular morphology, growth and function. This investigation details the implementation of a recently developed quantitative phase microscopy (QPM) method to measure the volume of erythrocytes under a range of osmotic conditions. QPM is a computational approach which utilizes simple bright field optics to generate cell phase maps which, together with knowledge of the cellular refractive index, may be used to measure cellular volume. Rat erythrocytes incubated in imidazole-buffered solutions (22 degrees C) of graded tonicity were analysed using QPM (n=10 cells/group, x63, 0.8 NA objective). Erythrocyte refractive index (1.367) was measured using a combination of phase and morphological data obtained from cells adopting spherical geometry under hypotonic conditions. Phase-computed volume increased with decreasing solution osmolality: 42.8 +/- 2.4, 48.7 +/- 2.3, 62.6 +/- 2.3, 90.8 +/- 7.7 mu m(3) in solutions of 540, 400, 240, and 170 mosmol/kg respectively. These volume changes were associated with crenated, bi-concave and spherical morphological states associated with increasing tonicity. This investigation demonstrates that QPM is a valid, simple and non-destructive approach for measuring cellular phase properties and volume. QPM cell volume analysis represents a significant advance in viable cell experimental capability and provides for acquisition of 'real-time' data - an option not previously available using other approaches. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据