4.6 Article

Genomic regions associated with amino acid composition in soybean

期刊

MOLECULAR BREEDING
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 79-89

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-005-2519-5

关键词

amino acid; genomic regions; Glycine max; lysine; QTL mapping; soybean; threonine; tryptophan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is the single largest source of protein in animal feed. However, few studies have been conducted to evaluate genomic regions controlling amino acid composition in soybean. It is important to study the genetics of amino acid composition to achieve improvements through breeding. The objectives of this study were to determine the ratios between essential to non-essential (E:NE) and essential to total (E:T) amino acids, and to identify genomic regions controlling essential and non-essential amino acid composition in soybean seed. To achieve these objectives, 101 F-6-derived recombinant inbred lines (RIL) developed from a cross of N87-984-16 x TN93-99 were used. Ground soybean seed samples were analyzed for amino acids using a near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) instrument. A significant (p < 0.01) difference among the RIL was found for amino acid composition. Heritability estimates on an entry mean basis ranged from 0.13 for His to 0.67 for Tyr. A total of 94 polymorphic simple sequence repeat (SSR) molecular genetic markers were screened in DNA from progenies. Single factor ANOVA was used to identify candidate quantitative trait loci (QTL), which were then confirmed by QTL Cartographer. At least one QTL for each amino acid was detected in this population. QTL linked to molecular markers Satt143, Satt168, Satt203, Satt274 and Satt495 were associated with most of the amino acids. Phenotypic variation explained by an individual QTL ranged from 9.4 to 45.3%. QTL detected for amino acids in soybean in this experiment are expected to be useful for future breeding programs targeting development of improved soybean amino acid composition for human and animal nutrition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据