4.4 Article

Influenza virus host response of C57Bl/6 mice treated with TACI-Ig

期刊

IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY AND IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 13-32

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08923970600623541

关键词

TACI-Ig; influenza; mouse

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TACI-Ig is a soluble glycoprotein comprised of a human IgG(1)-Fc fused with the extracellular domain of the human TACI receptor. Chronic exposure to TACI-Ig is associated with reduced circulating B cells in mouse and non-human primates, and a concomitant decrease in circulating immunoglobulin. Because of these activities, TACI-Ig is in clinical evaluation for treatment of various autoimmune diseases and B cell malignancies. In this study, the effect of TACI-Ig treatment on the ability of C57B1/6 mice to clear influenza virus was evaluated. C57B1/6 mice were exposed to vehicle (negative control), dexamethasone (positive control), or TACI-Ig (0.05, 0.50, or 5.0 mg/kg, SC, thrice weekly) from within one week prior to viral exposure through 21 days thereafter. Dexamethasone treatment of influenza-infected mice prolonged the infection, and decreased survival, body weight, lymphoid organ weight, influenza-specific IgM and IgG, and viral clearance relative to control animals, consistent with its expected immamosuppressive activity. Animals treated with TACI-Ig (0.05, 0.50, and 5.0 mg/kg) demonstrated a dose-dependent decrease in spleen weight and influenza-specific IgG and IgM in both lung and serum relative to control animals. In addition, flow cytometric analyses showed a decrease in B cells, but not T cells, in peripheral blood in animals treated with TACI-Ig. However, neither viral clearance nor survival was affected by TACI-Ig treatment. These data demonstrate the expected B cell-specific pharmacological effects of TACI-Ig in influenza-challenged C57B1/6 mice without apparent effect on influenza virus clearance. It is concluded that non-B cell related antiviral competence remains intact during TACI-Ig treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据