4.2 Article

Comparing e-service performance across industry sectors Drivers of overall satisfaction in online retailing

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/09590550610660215

关键词

Internet shopping; Electronic commerce; Retailing; Performance measures

资金

  1. Boston College

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - The online retail industry is enormous, covering a great assortment of products and services. Yet, little research has examined whether determinants of success in online retailing are similar or differ by industry sector. The purpose of this study is to examine industry sectors separately to distinguish drivers associated with overall satisfaction for the online consumers in those sectors. Design/methodology/approach - The paper uses ridge regression to examine how e-service quality dimensions are associated with overall customer satisfaction for several e-retailing sectors. Findings - While several e-service quality dimensions exhibit a similar impact across all sectors, several other dimensions exhibited sector-by-sector differences. The drivers that frequently differ across sectors include price perceptions, ease of returns and refunds, and privacy experience. Research limitations/implications - As an exploratory study, research opportunities and limitations derive from the public source of data, sample sizes within some of the sectors, and the ridge regression methodology. Practical implications - Related prior research examined individual e-retailing sectors, leading to scattered sets of findings that cannot be triangulated. The research allows for comparison by the manager, and presents empirical insights for managers in several e-retail sectors. Originality/value - This paper is one of only a few studies to examine a consistent set of e-service quality measures on a sector-by-sector basis. The paper is also unique in that it uses publicly available data sources to examine these relationships, providing managers with insights on how they might analyze such public data sets for their own usage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据